Skip to content

C++: Fix strtok model for indirections#14587

Merged
MathiasVP merged 2 commits intogithub:mainfrom
MathiasVP:fix-indirect-strtok-model
Oct 25, 2023
Merged

C++: Fix strtok model for indirections#14587
MathiasVP merged 2 commits intogithub:mainfrom
MathiasVP:fix-indirect-strtok-model

Conversation

@MathiasVP
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MathiasVP MathiasVP commented Oct 25, 2023

This fixes a missing case for the strtok model. The problem was revealed by the fixes in #14571, but the DCA run for the project that had this regression failed the DCA run. So we didn't spot the regression in the PR 😭.

@MathiasVP MathiasVP requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2023 08:40
@MathiasVP MathiasVP requested a review from jketema October 25, 2023 08:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the C++ label Oct 25, 2023
@MathiasVP MathiasVP added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label Oct 25, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jketema jketema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Do we need DCA for this?

@MathiasVP
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Oh yeah. I'll start one now.

@MathiasVP
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The integration test failures looks unrelated (they're all in Java-related tests).

@MathiasVP
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

DCA shows the expected new results 🎉

@MathiasVP MathiasVP merged commit 05385eb into github:main Oct 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

C++ no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants