-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
C++: Work around poor codegen for forex in IR-based range analysis
#13035
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rdmarsh2
merged 1 commit into
github:main
from
MathiasVP:ranked-phi-hack-for-bounded-phi
May 4, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How unique are these ids? From what I can tell, this call ultimately leads to the database id of
block.getFirstInstruction().getAst(). Can it never happen that an AST element produces two different instructions that are both first in a basic block?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, the result of
e.getOrigBlock().getUniqueId()is the database id ofe's IRBlock'sgetFirstInstruction().getAst(). I can't quite think of an AST element with that property, but I'm sure one can construct something like this (maybe something involving the ternary operator?).Originally, we were using the display index from the basic block, but this was totally infeasible to compute on real projects. If you have any suggestions for an integer representation whose uniqueness is easier to argue I'm all for it 😄.
This scheme has been used for a while now already in the new range-analysis library (in the modulus-phase) without any observable issues, though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be easy to check with a consistency query whether two IRBlocks ever get the same id. And even if they do, I suppose it only matters here if those IRBlocks go into the same phi node.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed