Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2023. It is now read-only.

How-to notebook for monitoring the status of a job#368

Closed
nonhermitian wants to merge 33 commits intoQiskit:masterfrom
nonhermitian:job_monitor_notebook
Closed

How-to notebook for monitoring the status of a job#368
nonhermitian wants to merge 33 commits intoQiskit:masterfrom
nonhermitian:job_monitor_notebook

Conversation

@nonhermitian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This requires qiskit-0.7 to be released first.

@jaygambetta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

can we make it more qiskit looking.

@nonhermitian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I can can the qiskit logo at top.

@jaygambetta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

can you change the name of qiskit_job_status to qiskit_job_monitor to be consistent?

can you also put a link in the index file after the ibmq_provider.
Can you also a put a blocking job_monitor in the getting started for part that runs on the real device.

@jaygambetta jaygambetta added on hold Can not fix yet qiskit0.7 labels Nov 18, 2018
@jaygambetta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

After the changes above @nonhermitian im good and maybe we should wait for 0.7

@jaygambetta jaygambetta removed the on hold Can not fix yet label Nov 21, 2018
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jaygambetta jaygambetta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see above.

@jaygambetta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

can you fix and point this to terra0.7 and i review tonight

@jaygambetta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also can you make this all the juypter tools. Backends and job_monitor

@nonhermitian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is superseded by #434

@nonhermitian nonhermitian deleted the job_monitor_notebook branch December 17, 2018 11:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants